[S1474] Why is
Darfur so important to the Jewish community?
|
|
|
In the cartoon above Uncle
Sam holds a sign saying, "Stop the war of extermination in Darfur"
as he stands on a pile of Palestinian, Iraqi and Afghan bodies. The
cartoonist could also have added Somali bodies. |
Joachim Martillo - thorsprovoni@aol.com
April 11, 2007
Context
Interfaith Leadership Meeting on
Darfur
Wednesday, March 21, 2007, the Interfaith Leadership
Meeting on Darfur took place between 11:00 AM and 1:00 PM at the Conservative
Jewish synagogue Kehillath Israel at 384 Harvard Street in Brookline.[1]
The synagogue's rabbi William Hamilton is a director of the David Project,
which has lead a media campaign against the Islamic Society of Boston (ISB) and
the Roxbury Crossing Islamic Center that the ISB is building. (See http://tinyurl.com/28n4x7 and http://tinyurl.com/2dxcyg.)
The meeting served as preparation for the March 29th public hearing of the
Massachusetts Joint Committee on Public Service during the on pending
legislation (S1474[2]) to direct
the Massachusetts state pension fund (Pension Reserves Investment Management
Board or PRIM) to divest selectively from Sudan because of the ongoing crisis
in Darfur.
The speakers included:
- the Reverend Dr. Gloria White-Hammond,[3]
who is co-pastor of the Bethel African Methodist Episcopal Church in
Jamaica Plain, Massachusetts and who has long been associated with
American Anti-Slavery Group and Christian Solidarity International (CSI),
which were accused of raising money for fraudulent slave redemptions
during the conflict in South Sudan (see http://tinyurl.com/24ryzx) and whose leaders often used the human rights
events and conferences as opportunities to defame and to demonize Arabs
and Muslims (see http://tinyurl.com/yp78gr),
- Mark Hanis, who is founder and executive director of the Global
Intervention Network and who states explicitly that his Birthright Israel
(http://www.birthrightisrael.org) trip provided him with the inspiration for his
suddenly well-funded Darfur campaign, which provides the perfect
distraction from the ongoing atrocities and genocide that the State of
Israel commits against the native population.[4]
- Mr. Eric Cohen, who is:
- Co-Chairman of the MA Coalition to Save Darfur,
- founder and Editor-at-Large of The New
Atlantis,
- an adjunct fellow at the Ethics and Public
Policy Center,
- a contributor to the flagship Neoconservative periodical
The Weekly Standard, and
- a collaborator with the preeminent
Neoconservative intellectual William Kristol in editing The Future is
Now: America Confronts the New Genetics (see http://tinyurl.com/2sxn6h),
- Ken Sweder, who is
- a former president of the Boston Jewish
Community Relations Council (JCRC),
- a current member of the board of directors of
the Boston JCRC, and
- a member of the Jewish Alliance for Law and Social
Action (JALSA), and
- several others, among whom was a local African American clergyman
with an excellent singing voice.
The attendees consisted of clergy and laymen of various
denominations and ethnic groups including an Egyptian Muslim.
There was no discussion during the meeting. The speakers simply presented the
current strategy and message about Darfur.
Gloria White-Hammond presented some horrific pictures and discussed the Sudan
Divestment Bill S1474 as the first in a serious of steps to bring about
intervention in Sudan. White-Hammond's approach to Darfur today is similar to
the techniques that she used on behalf of Charles Jacobs in the AASG. She
invokes a Pavlov trigger, which is usually a gruesome story or photograph, which
constitutes no proof whatsoever of her analysis of the situation in Sudan. In
this case, a viewer had no way to know whether he was looking at the victim of
government militia, rebel militia, brigands, tribal violence, a wife beating, or
a vehicular accident. Audience members assaulted by the images are supposed to
react by accepting her claims about the atrocities and the solutions without
question. White-Hammond is apparently most successful in using this technique to
manipulate well-off white Christian suburban Americans. She lamented the lack of participation of Muslims and
Muslim women in the Save Darfur movement.
Mark Hanis discussed the marketing of Sudan Divestment via sound bites and
punchy slogans, e.g., "Educate, advocate, legislate!"
Sweder is a professional Jew. The description does not mean that he is a doctor
or lawyer, for then he would be a Jewish professional. Professional Jews are
people like Abraham Foxman of the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) or David Harris
of the American Jewish Committee (AJC), and they work for at least one entity
within the network of Jewish communal organizations, which collectively
constitute the organized Jewish community.
Sweder discussed the issue of Darfur from the standpoint of a Jewish communal
insider.
He described the initial difficulty of persuading the Jewish Council for
Public Affairs (http://www.jewishpublicaffairs.org/),
which is the national umbrella organization for the local JCRCs, to support
divestment legislation because of the history of the opposition of the
organized Jewish community to divestment from Israel, but Sweder and others from the Boston organized Jewish community
explained the record of Boston-area human rights activities in which the
organized Jewish community has played the leading role. Within the Boston
organized Jewish community, the AASG and the David Project constitute the
primary human rights advocacy organizations. The Boston professional Jews argued
that controlling human rights discourse is "good for the Jews."
(See http://tinyurl.com/yp78gr.) The
Boston delegation successfully convinced the JCPA to lead the JCRCs in a campaign for selective
divestment from Sudan.[5] Thanks to the direct and indirect ongoing efforts of
JCRCs and groups aided or sponsored by JCRCs throughout the country, Sudan
divestment has become law in Iowa and is in
the process of approval in 12 states (http://tinyurl.com/2h9zwu).[6]
The last speaker led the attendees in a song that he
composed for the Save Darfur campaign.
Altogether the information provided by the presenters indicates that a clique from the most extremist racist segment of the Boston
Jewish community has with the resources of the JCPA and local
JCRCs transformed Darfur activism into a highly effective viral marketing
program. The JCPA has developed a program
that local JCRCs use in Jewish Community Centers, at media update
sessions, at college events and at interfaith sessions.
Then from the Jewish community the Darfur campaign has
spread even further through American intellectual and political culture with the aid of academic falsifiers and media pundits like Samantha Powers,
- who is the Anna Lindh Professor of Practice of Global Leadership
and Public Policy at Harvard's John F. Kennedy School of Government,
- who was the founding director of Carr Center for Human Rights Policy (1998-2002),
- who
has been heavily involved in misinforming the public about Darfur (see http://www.ksg.harvard.edu/cchrp/research/audiovideo.php)
and
- whose Pulitzer Prize winning book A Problem from Hell:
America and the Age of Genocide panders
ethnic Ashkenazi Americans by conveniently ignoring both
- the mass murders, ethnic cleansing and genocide
architected or executed by Bolshevik Ashkenazim during the Russian
Revolution and the first 25 years of the Soviet Union and also
- the premeditated genocide of the Palestinian
population that Zionist Ashkenazim plotted during the late 19th and
first half of the twentieth century, that they began in 1947, and
that they continue to execute to this very day.
Just as a biological epidemic initially does its harm
locally and then spreads rapidly over larger distances, the Darfur campaign has
spread like an influenza outbreak as Jewish bloggers and Jewish community
activists spread the propaganda to the media, to academia, throughout the
government, to the clergy, to business,[7]
throughout society, and finally internationally.
At
first, the Save Darfur movement only poisoned human rights discourse within the USA, then it began
threatening Sudan with an armed invasion practically guaranteed to
create a Sudanese disaster dwarfing that in Iraq, lately Darfur advocacy has complicated US relations with Arab
as well as Muslim states, and now it is beginning to interfere with US China
politics as Darfur activists have begun to target the Chinese Olympics.
Joint Committee on Public Service
Hearing for Pending Legislation S1474
On March 29, 2007 the Joint Committee on Public Service
heard testimony from approximately 300 politicians, students and activists at
the Boston State House on S1474. Chairman Jay Kaufman opened the hearing by
noting that he had never seen larger attendance at any similar event. For approximately three hours the Committee
listened to almost uniformly pro-Divestment testimony.
Actress Mia Farrow, whose movie career has been almost
entirely defined by her relationships with directors Otto Preminger, Andre
Previn and Woody Allen, has in some sense returned to her roots by taking part
in this JCRC production, for Otto Preminger is famous inter alia for the
screen adaptation of Leon Uris' novel, Exodus, whose composition was for
the most part financed by the Israeli government as propaganda. Since her
career tanked after her divorce from Woody Allen, she has been working hard to
establish her Jewish and pro-Israel credentials, and Hollywood sources have
indicated that she will get some parts in upcoming pictures from Universal if
her Darfur gig is successful enough.
Part of the video that Farrow showed at the hearing is hosted by Youtube at: http://tinyurl.com/2qu22e.
The gruesome images that Farrow showed in no way proved the veracity of her claims or the validity of selective divestment as a solution, but this sort of mental assault made it hard for the audience to judge her claims or proposed solutions rationally.
The
JCRC bussed high school students from Harwich to the hearing. Other speakers included members of the cast
from the AASG’s anti-Muslim anti-Arab fake human rights events like Panther
Alier of the Sudanese ‘Lost Boys’ and Smith College English Professor Eric
Reeves, who became an expert on the Sudan while working on the AASG and CSI’s
fraudulent “slave-redemption” campaign.
Eric
Cohen, who is a Neocon associate of William Kristol, also spoke.
Anthony
Barsamian of the KNOW Genocide Coalition and the Armenian Assembly of America
once again tagged along with the organized Jewish community. (See http://tinyurl.com/ysjo4x.)
Rabbi
Or N. Rose (Hebrew College, Newton, Massachusetts) connected the sufferings of
Darfurans to the sufferings of the Children of Israel in Egypt when he spoke.
The
Committee only questioned two witnesses, who represented local investment funds
and who had no problem with the Sudan Divestment Legislation because they were
going to sell stock short in order to profit from the decline in stock price
instead of profiting from any increase in stock value that resulted from
business that companies are doing in the Sudan.
The
Massachusetts Coalition to Save Darfur provides transcripts of a lot of
the pro-Sudan divestment testimony at http://savedarfurma.googlepages.com/statedivestment.
Only
three witnesses opposed S1474.
PRIM
executive director Michael Travaglini opposed S1474 because it would force
pension managers to assess the risk of divestment before investing in any
controversial region.
David
Rolde of the Green Rainbow Party attacked S1474 as a propaganda campaign to
demonize Arabs and Muslims and identified the pending legislation as part of an imperialist strategy to prepare
Americans for war in the Sudan to benefit of US and Israeli interests (http://www.green-rainbow.org/Newsletters/election06/articles/sudan.html).
Inventor-Entrepreneur
Joachim Martillo[8] read an
abridged version of a statement that deconstructed the interest of the
organized Jewish community in Darfur and that opposed S1474 because it is
harmful to Darfurans, based on falsehood and conceived in deceit.
Overall, the type of grass roots-like political activity in which
the organized Jewish community engaged at the Public Service Committee hearing
suggests that AIPAC and similar specifically Zionist political lobby
organizations represent only part of the web of control that Jewish or Zionist
groups can exert or attempt to exert over public discourse about the Middle
East, about human rights, about Arabs and about Islam.
Islamic Relief Fundraising Dinner
April 1, 2007
Islamic Relief Worldwide held a fund-raising dinner for Darfur at the Sheraton Colonial Hotel in
Wakefield, Massachusetts.[9]
Imam Zaid Shakir (http://www.zaidshakir.com/) of the
Zaytuna Institute (http://www.zaytuna.org/) was the
guest speaker.
These
gatherings are all fairly similar whether they are run by Muslim American
religious, Arab American political, Jewish American religious, or ethnic
Ashkenazi American political groups.
The
fund-raising organization provides a catered meal in one of the hotel’s
conference rooms. Islamic Relief
provided fairly standard American fare of fish or vegetarian lasagna. In terms of interesting ethnic cuisine, the
American Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee (http://www.adc.org/) provides a far superior meal, but
the Islamic religious groups provide the best child care and can serve as a
reasonable way for a couple with young children to get out for an evening.
The speakers
described their experiences at refugee camps in Darfur and the slides were not
nearly as gruesome as the pictures provided by Gloria White-Hammond or Mia
Farrow. Imam Shakir emphasized the
Islamic piety of the population of Darfur.
The Islamic
Relief speaker pointed out that janjaweed (standard Arabic jund
jawa’id) is simply a generic term for cavalry or militia. A janjaweed
may be allied with the government, fighting for the rebellion or simply
engaging in brigandage.
Because
Darfur and Chad are so resource poor, refugee women that ventured outside the
camps to collect firewood threatened the livelihood of local people, who
sometimes became angry and attacked the refugees. This sort of violence is a consequence of the civilian population
displacement caused by the civil war but is separate from the fighting between
the rebels and the government. Once Islamic Relief workers acquired more
efficient stoves so that the refugees gathered far less wood for fuel, a major
source of friction between refugees and local people diminished tremendously.
Islamic
Relief sought no money for political lobbying, and the audience was quite
charitable. One attendee pledged
$10,000 to aid the refugees while two other guests pledged $5,000, and
practically everyone pledged something or forwent dessert.
Statement Preface
The text
below is Joachim Martillo's complete statement, of which he read an abridgement
before the Massachusetts Joint Committee on Public Service during the March
29th public hearing on pending legislation S1474.
The
statement is tailored to the Passover season just as was the speech of Rabbi Or
N. Rose (Hebrew College, Newton, Massachusetts) before the Committee.
At a
Passover Seder (home service) traditionally the youngest child asks four
questions that relate to Passover to the other attendees. This Passover all Americans
should ask a fifth question of the organized Jewish community.
The fifth question: why is
Darfur so important to the organized Jewish community?
Because the organized Jewish community has taken the
lead in pushing the Massachusetts legislature to pass a bill to require the
state pension fund to undertake selective divestment from Sudan, both citizens
and legislators need to understand the importance of Darfur to the organized
Jewish community.
Because it is the Passover season, many Jewish Darfur
activists explicitly compare the sufferings of Darfurans with the afflictions
of the bnai yisrael (Children of Israel) in Egyptian bondage. Such activists
express the hope that Sudan Divestment can be the first step in liberating
Darfurans just as the Exodus brought freedom as the first step in transforming
the Children of Israel into the am yisrael (Community of Israel)[10].
This transformation reaches completion with the giving of the Law of Moses.[11]
Gentiles can be come Jews through a ritual acceptance
of the Law of Moses. For the last several hundred years, as the final step of
the process, the convert affirms the “Thirteen Principles of the Jewish Faith.”
Moses (Mosheh, Musa) Maimonides (the RAMBAM), who is the preeminent rabbinic
scholar of the Middle Ages and who unlike the vast majority of modern Jews was
ethnically Arab (See http://tinyurl.com/3bpcr6), first
summarized these principles in the twelfth century in his Commentary to Mishnah
(Sanhedrin, chapter 10). They provide a useful intellectual framework for
deconstructing the primary concerns of the organized Jewish community in the
Darfuran conflict.
The RAMBAM's first affirmation tells us to start with
fundamentals just as he starts with core idea of Jewish religion.
[Please note that different versions of the Thirteen Principles have minor
variations in formulation and order because of the different choices that
various translators made in rendering the original Arabic text into Hebrew.]
Ani maamin beemunah shlemah
shehabore yitbarakh shmo hu bore umanhig lekhol habrurim, wehu levado asah
weoseh weyaaseh lekhol hamaasim.
I believe with complete faith that the Creator — blessed be His Name — is
Creator and Guide to all his creatures, and he alone made and makes and will
make everything.
Here are the basics of Darfur.
In Darfur practically everyone is a black African Muslim.
The population is divided between nomads and settled farmers.
Since at least as far back as 1987 when there was a crop failure in Darfur, the
Sudan Liberation Army has been attempting to recruit and to organize the
settled farmers in an attempt to overthrow the Central Sudanese government. The
movement presents itself as democratic, but some of the leaders may have dreams
of reestablishing the minor Islamic Empire that used to be centered on Darfur.
The other rebel group is the Justice and Equality Movement, which is allied
with Hasan al-Turabi, who is an Islamist opposition leader with pan-Islamic
politics.
The ruler of Sudan is Omar al-Bashir. He is also Islamist-inclined, but he has
a more Arabist orientation. As a consequence his allies are generally called
Arabs as a political statement even if they are black Africans as is the case
in Darfur. He is more or less allied with the US in the War on Terror.
The RAMBAM tells us in affirmation ten that the organized Jewish community
cannot conceal its real motivations.
Ani maamin beemunah shlemah shehabore yitbarakh shmo yodea kol maaseh bnei
adam wekhol mahshevotam sheneemar: hayotzer yahad libam, hamevin el kol
maaseihem.
I
believe with complete faith that the Creator —
blessed be His
Name —
knows every deed of men and all their thoughts as it is said: He
Who puts their hearts together is He Who understands all their deeds.
A large segment of the organized Jewish community is panicked at an open public
discussion of the crimes of the State of Israel and at the growing size or
potential political strength of the American Muslim community.
Darfur divestment is a red herring that Israel advocacy organizations have
cooked up as a distraction. Militant Zionists have used this sort of tactic for
decades. In the 30s the most extreme Americans Zionists invariably opposed
discrimination against African Americans[12]
in order to obscure the key racist principle of Zionism:
Zionism presupposes that the historical or national rights of Jews to Palestine are superior to the human rights of the native population.
It
is hard to be more racist in the Central or Eastern European völkisch
sense.
During the 30s there were few Arab or Muslim Americans, and the racist
motivation of many superficially progressive activities of the organized Jewish
community was hard to discern except perhaps by Polish blue-collar workers, who
were generally stiffed by Jewish labor leaders.
Does the organized Jewish community really care about the rights of African
Americans?
The criminal conspiracy of the Boston chapters of the Jewish Community
Relations Council (JCRC, http://www.jcrcboston.org/), the
Anti-Defamation League (ADL, http://www.adl.org/) and the American Jewish
Committee (AJC, http://www.ajcboston.org) in the attempt
of the David Project (DP, http://www.davidproject.org) to
deprive local Muslim Americans of their fundamental constitutional rights as
American citizens to assemble and to worship freely in a new mosque at Roxbury
Crossing is stymieing a major effort to bring an infusion of cash into a
depressed African American section of Boston. (See http://tinyurl.com/yqdtvw, http://tinyurl.com/yayd4n.)
The organized Jewish community is saying, “Blacks don't have the right to
political respect. African Americans may not benefit from a major development
effort unless we bless it.”
Does the organized Jewish community really care about Africans?
During the 90s the
American Anti-Slavery Group (AASG), which like the DP was founded by Charles
Jacobs (http://tinyurl.com/yp78gr), engaged in an
anti-Arab propaganda campaign that scammed non-Jews by raising money in a fake
effort to redeem slaves, who were supposed to have been captured during the
civil war in Southern Sudan. Investigative reporting in the Irish Times
and the Washington Post (“The Great Slave Scam”, The Irish Times, 23
February 2002; “Ripping Off Slave ‘Redeemers’”, The Washington Post, 26
February 2002, http://tinyurl.com/24ryzx)
described how the AASG raised money from non-Jews and then divided it with
Sudanese pretending to be either slaves or slavers. The AASG seems to have used
most of the donations for the slave redemption to fund Zionist propaganda
campaigns, which count as educational activities under the rules of 501 (c) (3)
entities as defined in the US tax code.[13]
Because anti-Black, anti-Arab, and anti-Muslim
activities of the organized Jewish community are becoming more entwined with
general subversion of American norms for the sake of the State of Israel and
with profiteering at the expense of gullible people or goyishe kep
(non-Jewish heads) as one says in Yiddish idiom, genuinely anti-racist and
patriotic Jewish Americans have an ethical obligation to oppose professional
Jews like Nancy Kaufman (JCRC, http://tinyurl.com/yqfj2l),
Andrew Tarsy (ADL, http://tinyurl.com/yqgg5k),
Abe Foxman (ADL, http://tinyurl.com/3cghhj),
David Harris (AJC, http://tinyurl.com/2nkc8j)
and, of course, Charles Jacobs (DP, http://tinyurl.com/yvyvjp,
http://semitism.net/?p=51) as well as the Jewish
plutocrats like the Bronfmans (http://tinyurl.com/39tcxv),
Saban (http://tinyurl.com/24ldft), the Krafts (http://tinyurl.com/36odpd)[14]
and the Adelsons (http://tinyurl.com/35xqc6),
whose contributions make it possible for the professional Jews to ignore the
concerns of the vast majority of the American Jewish community.
As more and more official Jewish groups adopt
Jacobs' tactics of creating fake or distorted human rights or constitutional
issues to defame or demonize Arabs and Muslims, the most racist un-American
subversive treasonous segment of the American Jewish community is solidifying
its hold over a wide range of Jewish communal organizations with serious
repercussions both for the USA and also for American Jews.
The RAMBAM tells us the following.
Ani maamin beemunah shlemah,
shehabore yitbarakh shmo gomel tov leshomrei mitswotaw umaanish leovri mitswotaw.
I
believe with complete faith that the Creator —
blessed be His
Name — rewards those who observe His Commandments and punishes those
who transgress them.
Some of the consequences are obvious. Hostility toward Jews
is rising worldwide, and we can expect it to increase in the USA, but the
misuse of the Darfur and related misbehavior of the organized Jewish community
and Zionist Lobby no longer only threatens Palestinians, Iraqis and Afghans but
is now becoming a threat to the USA in general and to Massachusetts in
particular.
In order to understand how Darfur advocacy by the organized Jewish community
harms the USA, the American public must change the paradigm that it uses to
understand the conflict.
Darfur is the site of a very messy civil war. It is somewhat similar to the
disaster that the US has caused in Iraq under the direction of extremist
Zionist Neocons with two qualifications.
America is less directly involved, and the US
has caused far more death and displacement of population in Iraq in four years
than has occurred during 20 years of fighting in Darfur, where most of conflict
related deaths have been the result of starvation or disease..
|
|
|
Here is a Muslim American view of the Sudan
Divestment movement. |
Now we are seeing in Darfur a phase that looks something
like Sherman's March through Georgia during the American Civil War.
Was the Union perpetrating genocide of white southerners? No.
Should the UK have undertaken an economic boycott of the Union? No.
The March was horrific, and the Union on the whole committed far more atrocities
than the Confederacy during the Civil War, but British divestment from the Union would not have
helped. would probably have prolonged the conflict, and might have assured the
continuance of the slave system. Because British sanctions could have served
British economic interests by removing the Union as an industrial competitor and
by guaranteeing the flow of raw materials from the Confederacy, any economic
punishment of the Union would have looked like self-serving hypocrisy.
Likewise, the organized Jewish community's proposal of selective divestment in
Darfur will probably make the conflict more intractable, worsen conditions for
Darfuran civilians, and remove any doubts non-Americans have about considering
the USA a dangerous hypocritical nation that threatens the rest of the world.
Groups of Americans feign to care about alleged genocide in Darfur, but America
is the mainstay of the State of Israel, which was founded by Eastern European
Zionists after the mass murders of Jews during WW2. The Zionists stole the
country and carried out a premeditated genocide of the native population with
the justification that there is an etymological relationship between the word
Jew and the word Judea. (See http://tinyurl.com/3bpcr6
for a brief discussion of Jewish ethnography.)
If the Irish had applied the same logic after the potato famines, they, who are
mostly Roman Catholic, would have claimed the right to steal Rome and genocide
the native population because the word Roman in the phrase Roman
Catholic is a derivative of the proper noun Rome.
Obviously, Zionism is so extreme that it is psychotic, and we Americans
certainly do not have the right to call people in Africa or Asia extremist if
they are inclined to Islamism as long as we support the State of Israel, and
practically no non-Americans anywhere believe any US claims of concern about
genocide or of desire to support democracy, anti-racism and human rights
throughout the world.
Even worse from our standpoint here in Massachusetts, the behavior of the David
Project, the Jewish Community Relations Council, and the American Jewish
Committee in the matter of the Roxbury Mosque as well as the ongoing
Islamophobic incitement by these and other Jewish communal organizations, leads
the rest of the world to consider the USA in general and Boston or
Massachusetts in specific to be Islamophobia central. (See http://tinyurl.com/yrltfb.)
The Boston organized Jewish community
inadvertently or perhaps purposely is putting the US and specifically
Massachusetts in the same sort of adversarial relationship that the State of
Israel has with the Arab and Muslim world.
One hundred years ago it would not have mattered, but in a world where travel
between any two parts of the globe generally takes less than a day and where
Arabic or Muslim countries are a major source of liquidity and investment
capital, perceived hostility toward approximately 1.5 billion Muslims is really
significant and costly to all Americans and those of us in Massachusetts in
particular. When venture capitalists in the United Arab Emirates or in Malaysia
look for biotech or hi-tech startups to fund, they skip over Massachusetts.
If the Massachusetts legislature really is sincere in caring about the lives
and rights of Muslims either in Africa or here in the USA, or if the
Massachusetts legislature wants to show Arabic and Islamic investors, who could
genuinely help our economy, that we are not the flaming anti-Islamic bigots and
fanatics that the professional Jews of the DP and their friends in the JCRC,
ADL, and AJC are,
- it should be undertaking an investigation of
criminal conspiracy that the David Project has organized against Muslim
American citizens here in Boston, and
- it should support Islamic relief organizations to
help the civilian population of Darfur.
The RAMBAM concludes the thirteen principles with a
statement of key Jewish beliefs.
Ani maamin beemunah shlemah
beviat hamashiah weaf al pi sheyitmahmeah, im kol zeh ehakeh lo bekhol sheyavo.
I believe with complete faith in the coming of the messiah, and
even if he tarries, despite all this I will expect in anticipation of him every
day that he will come.
Ani maamin be emunah shlemah, shetihyeh tehiyat hametim beet
sheyaaleh ratzon meet habore yitbarakh shmo weyitaleh zikhro laad ulnetzah
netzahim.
I believe with complete faith
that there will be resurrection of the dead at the time of choosing of the
Creator — blessed be His Name — and remembrance of him will be exalted forever
and for all time.
These two
affirmations underscore the core deceit that the organized Jewish community is
committing. Stealing Palestine to create a Zionist state in the pre-messianic
period is a rejection of the twelfth affirmation, and the organized Jewish
community continues to lie about the State of Israel, the Middle East, Sudan,
Arabs and Muslims, because faith in the resurrection that comes with the
ultimate Day of Judgment is no longer of any concern to the organized Jewish
community. Moreover, the vast majority of professional Jews in official Jewish
communal organizations have substituted ethnic narcissism, Holocaust obsession
and worship of the State of Israel for the fundamentals of Jewish faith, which
Muslims equate with observance of the Tawrat Musa. This phrase is the Arabic
equivalent of Torat Mosheh in Hebrew and of the Law of Moses in English.
The RAMBAM thus leads us to conclude this analysis of the importance of Darfur
to the organized Jewish community as follows.
I believe with complete faith
that racists are trying to deceive the Massachusetts legislature.[15]
Ani maamin beemunah shlemah
shehagizanim menassim lehat`ot et beit hamhokekim shel Masatshusets.
Let the Massachusetts legislature undertake the following
steps for the sake of Darfurans, Americans, and the millions of victims of
Zionist machinations.
- Reject the Sudan Divestment proposal.
- Reject subversive groups that try to score
political points for the sake of the State of Israel to the detriment of
Massachusetts and the USA.
- Work to get the USA out of Iraq.
- Support the abolition of the Zionist State of
Israel just as Massachusetts in the nineteenth century took the lead in
confronting the very similar evil of American slavery.
|
|
|
The web site http://www.ifamericansknew.com has
copiously documented New York Times distortions in matters related to
Israel and Zionist issues, e.g., http://tinyurl.com/2h8g9x. The David Project seeks to place its
Israel Advocacy trainees at the New York Times and other
media organizations so that they can act as information gatekeepers and
facilitators. (See http://tinyurl.com/2gmqe4
for an example at the Harvard Crimson.) Similar media manipulation
seems to take place at the Boston Globe where columnist Jeff Jacoby
often serves as the mouthpiece for David Project talking points. |
